-
Type: QA Task
-
Status: Done (View Workflow)
-
Resolution: Completed
-
Fix Version/s: CFA 2021R1
-
Labels:None
-
Work Type Classification:Sustaining
Create Test Cases
After functional Review with Michael and feed back from Harrison, I'm refactoring the test cases.
Hey Charles/Soma,
Good questions! I can document these in Confluence as well for future reference.
I believe your assumptions are correct. This store did better than the top 10% of the chain, but there's still room for improvement because they could still get that rate closer to 100%.
Labor Hours Used - The name says it all; this is the amount of labor hours used on that day in the restaurant
Benchmark Hours - This is the amount of hours used by the typical store in the top 10% of the chain. The 10% is determined by what you select when running the report (10%, 50%, etc).
Labor Cost Opportunity $ - This is the dollar value of the Labor Hours that you either outperformed compared to the top 10% of the chain or underperformed. So in this case, the store used 46.05 fewer Labor Hours than the benchmark. Those 46.05 hours have a value of $630.30. The Labor Cost Opportunity $ value is determined by which Wage Rate you select when running the report. Because you selected Average Wage, the formula looks like this: Labor Cost Opportunity $ = Hours Difference * Average Wage.
Labor Cost Opportunity % = Labor Cost Opportunity $ / This Year's Sales
Actual Productivity Rate - The name is pretty descriptive; this is how productive this store was. I'm not sure how it is determined, though.
Benchmark Productivity Rate - How productive the top 10% of the chain was.
Average Wage Rate - Average wages for the top 10% of stores. This column changes based on which wage category you chose when running the report, Average or Actual.
Actual Labor Cost % = Average Wage Rate / Actual Productivity Rate
Thanks!
. . .
Harrison Sloan
Restaurant Financial Management
Digital Transformation & Technology